Polar Bears are going extinct and it is because of human activity. John Roach
describes this in an article he wrote for National Geographic titled "Most
Polar Bears Gone By 2050, studies say" published September 10, 2007. In
the article John address the fact that Polar Bears are disappearing and by 2050
most will have disappeared. Studies have shown that as the ice at the North
Pole melts the Polar Bears loose more hunting ground and they have to swim
farther for food.
The
main cause of the sea ice melting is global warming. Global warming is
something that humans have started. When we burn coal or drive in a car we
release CO2 and other harmful gasses. These gasses build up in our atmosphere
and heat up the Earth. This is what is melting the sea ice. The Polar Bears
need the sea ice, “as the sea ice goes, so goes the polar
bear," said by Steven Amstrup who is a wildlife research biologist. What
he said is true, the Polar Bears use the ice to hunt and live on. As the ice
melts the Polar Bears need to go father to get food. Due to this a lot of Polar
Bears are dying.
I could really connect to this
article because it was so well written along with the fact that I can relate it
to what I learned in class. In class I learned about how if you take away one
organism from the ecosystem it could be disastrous and affect every organism in
the habitat. I connected this to the article because if you were to take Polar
Bears out of the ecosystem it could be disastrous. If Polar Bears go extinct
then the seal population might increase which would affect the fish population.
I was also able to connect to this
article because the whole reason Polar Bears are going extinct is because of
global warming. In 8th grade we did a research project and I did
mine on global warming. That is why I was able to connect so well to the
article. The whole reason I even chose this topic is because it was related to
global warming and what we learned in class. I already had knowledge on global
warming so when I was reading I understood how the ice was melting which made
it easy for me to understand overall what the article was talking about.
I, all together, loved this article
because it addresses such a serious problem in such an easy to understand way.
It didn’t use any long hard to understand words. It gives data and numbers to
help the author explain his point. For example, it mentions, “Scientists estimate
that 20,000 to 25,000 Polar Bears live throughout the Northern Hemisphere in
areas that are covered by sea ice for extensive periods.” I like when the
author gives data like this because it gives me an idea on how many Polar Bears
could be left out of the 20 to 25 thousand Polar Bears that are around at this
time. I really liked this article,
however, it left me with a question. When it mentioned that if we stop
polluting the atmosphere right now we can stop but if we wait it will be too
late it made me think, “what could you or I do to help stop the emission of CO2
and other gasses and save the Polar Bears?”
Jack, you bring up a great point about the Polar Bears and this defiantly should be addressed publicly. It saddens me to see so many species begin to die out all over the world just because of problems caused by us. One of which is global warming. I think that as the U.S.A we should help save and bring up the populations of the Polar Bear. We have already done it once for the Eagles and they now have a healthy and strong population across the United States, so why can't we help the Polar Bears? This answer for me is not hard. We should have no hesitation in our action no matter the problems in our way to help a soon dead species and keeps ecosystems healthy and alive. This also connects to class work on ecosystems. We did many things regarding taking an animal out of an ecosystem and how it can have a devastating effect on the species around them. If the Polar Bear did die off this would greatly increase the seal populations and ultimately decrease the fish population. If we don't help the Polar Bear we would lose and wonderful animal, but also risk destroying ecosystems.
ReplyDelete