Friday, March 7, 2014

Where have all the whales gone?

Today I read the article, "Court Hears Arguments on Whaling by Japan" written by Marlise Simmons published on June 26th, 2013 on the NY Times website.
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/27/world/asia/court-hears-arguments-on-whaling-by-japan.html?ref=whalesandwhaling

This article talked all about the never ending debate about whether or not it is okay for the Japanese and other Pacific Nations to participate in whaling in the Southern Pacific Ocean. After years of hundreds and whales being slaughtered Australia and New Zealand had enough of Japan's action and in June of last year took their case to the International Court of Justice.

This article recaps what has transpired in the case as of the published date. Australia believes that Japan has violated the 1946 international convention regulating whaling and the 1986 moratorium on commercial activity set by the International Whaling Commission. The Australian government believed that Japan has since killed more than 10,000 whales. A quote the article used, '“We are saying what Japan is doing is blatantly commercial, it’s not science, it has to stop,” Bill Campbell, who heads Australia’s legal team, said in a telephone interview from The Hague. “You don’t kill 935 whales in a year to do scientific research, you don’t even need to kill one whale.”'

Minke Whale
Link:
 http://wildwhales.org/wp-content/themes/wildwhales/images/minkebreach_popup.jpg
Although Japan is one of three nations that participate in whaling, Iceland and Norway being the other two, is it the only one claiming to be whaling on behalf of science and in the Southern Pacific Ocean around Australia and New Zealand who have claimed that water as a place for whales to be free.

Australia and Japan were to make their cases before 16 judges at the United Nations’ highest judicial body, in an international equivalent of a civil suit.

Japan’s hunt is mostly minke whales and some fin whales in the Ocean close by Antarctica which is allowed by the whaling convention and the International Whaling Commission, which also allowed for the killing of whales for scientific research.

The Japanese delegation said that the minke whale population was more than 500,000 in the Antarctic region and that their research needs of about 815 minke whales per year were sustainable and well below the mammals’ reproductive rate.







I thought this article was very interesting and a topic very close to me. I'm very interesting and marine biology and do not find that whaling is a good thing for the marine ecosystem. The marine ecosystem suffers from many different things including oil spills, destruction of coral reefs, and whaling among many more. I think that saying they need over 800 dead whales to conduct scientific experiments is absurd and preposterous. I don't understand their need for whales, but I find it wrong. Personally I would have to side with Australia and New Zealand on this case because there are regulations on whaling and Japan is not really following them. 

This relates to biology class because if we think back to when we learned about food webs and food chains, we know that the presences of an animal in an ecosystem is crucial to how the ecosystem functions and how the populations of animals survives. Although whales are commonly at the top of the food chain, they eat other animals so if they aren't there to eat these organisms then their populations will explode. Which in return will shrink their population because with more of that kind of organism around they will be in need for food. Since they need more food then they will eventually eat the other organisms into extinction. 

I think whaling is a major problem in the world and it either needs to stop or be substantially cut down. I think Australia is right for cracking down on Japan.



15 comments:

  1. Your title caught my eye and made me want to read more. You also gave a detailed description of what the article was about. Also you gave specific numbers on how many whales were killed which surprised me. For example when you said Japan killed over 10,000 whales I was surprised that they hunted so many whales. I also thought it was strange that Japan said that they needed over 800 whales for science. Overall, I thought your article was very well written, good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dennis you blog comment is great. First of all, the picture of the whale made your article stand. I am supervised that nations are still able to kill whales even though their numbers are dwindling. I personal agree with what New Zealend in saying that the water is a place for them to be free. Your connection to biology tied in very well with the overall post, making this writing even better. I also wonder why people continually kill endangered animals, some people are just sick. Overall, great post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dennis, having been a viewer of the show “Whale Wars” your title caught my eye. I do agree with you that it is completely absurd that Japan claims that they need 900 dead whales for research. I think Japan should obey the international laws on whaling and how many whales you are permitted to catch. I thought it was very good that you presented exact figures about the rates that Japan has been whaling at. Only a few mechanical mistakes but other than that you have a very solid post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great job Dennis! I was unaware of this problem of whaling in Japan. I also agree with Australia and New Zealand that Japan is violating rules and being cruel to whales for no reason. It is not necessary to kill that many whales for scientific research each year, and if they don’t stop soon, the whale population will decrease and might even become in danger of extinction. This is a great connection to our studies of food chains and food webs because we know there can be many problems when certain populations in the food web decrease or become extinct. Great blog!

    ReplyDelete
  5. First of all Dennis this was a great post. I too do not understand why nations are allowing this to happen to whales. I find hunting species a very terrible thing and a rising problem in this world and there as been no way to stop it. Hunting is also a problem for different animals like the Rhino and there numbers are shrinking. I think the United Nations has to find a way to stop this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dennis, great job on your blog post! Choosing a question for the title was a good idea because it made me want to read the post and discover more about the topic. After I read your post, I found out a lot of information about whaling I did not know before and it made me want to stop Japan from killing so many of them. It is wrong for Japan to do this and say it is for scientific research, and it is great that Australia and New Zealand are bringing this problem to light. Your relation to biology class is very good and ties right into the topic. This was an interesting post that made me think more about human causes in the environment. Awesome job!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dennis, this was a very well done blog post and I like the topic you chose. I agree with you on the fact that catching and killing so many whales is preposterous and I would side with New Zealand and Australia too. I am actually quite confused by how Japan is using the whales for scientific research and I believe that they might just be saying that as an excuse for catching absurd amounts of whales. However, if they are using it for scientific research, then how much progress has been made and what have they figured out by catching and killing so many whales? I think that is a key thing left out in this article which might support Japan’s side. This was a very interesting topic that I believe people should know about, well done.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good job on this post. The title related to the topic, definitely caught my eye. The subject that you chose to write about was amazing, and your use of supportive quotes was good. I agree that no whales should be killed "for science", though that phrase warrants many unusual things. I agree that Australia is right to bring this to court, and I'm amazed that Japan killed 935 whales in one year. Overall, your summary provided detailed evidence that was supportive of your thesis, and the subject was very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dennis, your post was very good. The subject you chose to write about was very interesting and was fun to read. I never knew how whale fishing/catching was so absurd. Your article, like Angela said, wants me to go tell Japan off and make them stop whaling. Your comparison to class was very easy to understand, and was interesting to see. Great job

    ReplyDelete
  10. 800 whales is a huge number that Japan says is necessary for experimentation, and I can't help but wonder why they specifically need whales for these experiments.Whales are a huge part of the ocean's food web due to all of the smaller plankton that they eat, and removing even a couple of whales from an area can disturb populations of other animals in a huge way.
    If many of the whales caught were in fact being used as a food source, is this any worse than the animals raised and killed within factories. I'd say the whales' lives are much better, as they at least get to live out some of their lives in the wild before their death.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great job, Dennis! Your title caught my attention and made me want to read more. Your post was extremely interesting. I agree with you and Australia. Japan definitely doesn't need to kill 935 whales a year for scientific research. That seems like much more than necessary. I really liked your connection to what we learned about food webs and food chains in class this year. Whaling this many whales each year will greatly impact the rest of the food webs and food chains in the ocean that incorporate whales. I hope that Japan cuts down on their whaling significantly.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I loved your blog right from the title itself. We don't really find ourselves thinking about Whales and other animals as much as we think about other stuff. I think your blog was very interesting and kept me reading till the end! I do agree with you and Australia; I think it's almost cruel that Japan kills 935 whales year for scientific research. Whales are a huge part of the ocean's ecosystem and like you said it really does affect the entire ocean's food web because an unbalance is created now. In conclusion, I think you did an excellent job with the response to the article. Keep it up!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Awesome job, Dennis, I loved the title you gave it. Personally I agree with New Zealand and Austraila, the whales should be free in the water, it's terrible to think that japan has killed nearly a thousand whales for "scientific" reseach. I'm really glad that you brought this article to our attention, these days we don't learn enough about the whales. I think you did a great job with your blog post!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I really enjoyed your blog post. I agree with your opinion. There is no need for Japan to be killing that many whales for research. I like how you gave specific details to help support your topic. Your quote also helps support your topic perfectly. The title of your blog made me want to read it and find out what it is about. I hope this problem gets fixed before it gets any worse. People do not know enough about this problem, and should learn more in order to fix it. Overall, awesome job!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I really liked your title and your summary of the article. I haven't heard much about this whaling scandal, but it definitely seems wrong. I don't know what kind of science experiments would require the death of many innocent whales, but I hope that Japan decides that the lives of whales should be valued above their research. Your summary really gave me a lot of good and clear information on this topic. Good job!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.